Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
The ISME Journal (2022 )Cite this article
The scaly-foot snail (Chrysomallon squamiferum) inhabiting deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the Indian Ocean relies on its sulphur-oxidising gammaproteobacterial endosymbionts for nutrition and energy. In this study, we investigate the specificity, transmission mode, and stability of multiple scaly-foot snail populations dwelling in five vent fields with considerably disparate geological, physical and chemical environmental conditions. Results of population genomics analyses reveal an incongruent phylogeny between the endosymbiont and mitochondrial genomes of the scaly-foot snails in the five vent fields sampled, indicating that the hosts obtain endosymbionts via horizontal transmission in each generation. However, the genetic homogeneity of many symbiont populations implies that vertical transmission cannot be ruled out either. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation of ovarian tissue yields symbiont signals around the oocytes, suggesting that vertical transmission co-occurs with horizontal transmission. Results of in situ environmental measurements and gene expression analyses from in situ fixed samples show that the snail host buffers the differences in environmental conditions to provide the endosymbionts with a stable intracellular micro-environment, where the symbionts serve key metabolic functions and benefit from the host’s cushion. The mixed transmission mode, symbiont specificity at the species level, and stable intracellular environment provided by the host support the evolutionary, ecological, and physiological success of scaly-foot snail holobionts in different vents with unique environmental parameters.
Eukaryotes establishing a symbiotic relationship with chemosynthetic bacteria are widespread among diverse marine habitats, from shallow water to deep sea [1]. For example, solemyids, lucinids, and thyasirids which dwell in both shallow-water and deep-sea chemosynthetic environments harbour chemosynthetic symbionts [1]. Deep-sea chemosynthetic environments, such as hydrothermal vents and hydrocarbon seeps, are the best known habitats for chemosymbiosis. In these ecosystems, many endemic animals depend on the chemosynthesis of symbiotic microbes for nutrients. For instance, Bathymodiolus mussels, Alviniconcha snails, and Riftia tubeworms acquire environmental bacteria via horizontal transmission upon settlement and retain them as endosymbionts [2,3,4]. Deep-sea vesicomyid clams, such as Phreagena okutanii and Turneroconcha magnifica, rely on vertical transmission to transmit their endosymbionts from mother to offspring [5,6,7]. Solemyid clams, such as Solemya velum, adopt a combination of vertical and horizontal transmission to obtain their symbionts [8, 9]. However, the life cycles and transmission modes of most other deep-sea chemosymbiotic organisms are unknown.
Transmission mode plays a pivotal role in the symbiosis establishment, partner specificity, and symbiont genetic diversity of a holobiont. Stringent vertical transmission leads to strong genetic coupling between the host mitochondria and symbionts because they are transmitted together to the offspring via gametes over generations [7]. Conversely, in horizontal transmission, the coupling of alleles between the host mitochondria and symbionts can be obscured [8, 9]. For example, the phylogeny of the host mitochondria and symbionts of many vesicomyid clams adopting vertical transmission is congruent [10]. However, occasional horizontal transmission events, such as those in T. magnifica and Calyptogena fausta clams, have been shown to break the phylogenetic congruency between host mitochondria and symbionts [9, 11]. Bathymodiolus mussels using horizontal transmission and Solemya clams using a mixed transmission mode, on the other hand, exhibit incongruent phylogeny with their symbionts [9].
Another theoretical assumption is that the environmental pool of symbionts is genetically diverse but homogeneous within a small-scale area, where different host individuals have access to the same symbiont strains [3]. Under this assumption, if horizontal transmission persists for at least a significant part of the lifetime of individual hosts, the genetic diversity of symbiont populations could closely reflect that of the environmental pool and exhibit high intra-host heterogeneity and inter-host homogeneity across host individuals living in the same vent field [2]. For instance, distinct strains of specific bacterial species can co-exist in Bathymodiolus mussels, and the symbiont strain heterogeneity is similar in mussels living in the same vent field but different across different vents [2]. However, if horizontal transmission occurs in a restricted process (e.g. a short period of time in the life cycle of the host or limited uptake of symbionts), the symbiont populations would be affected by strong population bottlenecks [6, 12]. Limited strains taken up by the host would lead to intra-host homogeneity, which has been observed in Riftia, Escarpia, and Lamellibrachia tubeworms [13, 14]. If the host individuals transfer symbionts in a short period and the free-living symbionts change under fluctuating vent environments, the inter-host heterogeneity would increase across host individuals. This phenomenon has been observed in B. brooksi mussels [12]. In vertical transmission, only a small part of symbionts would be transmitted with egg cells, and genetic drift further lowers the intra-host symbiont genetic diversity. The accumulation of within-host mutations increases the divergence of symbiont populations across host individuals [6]. In this case, symbiont populations are expected to present extreme intra-host homogeneity and inter-host heterogeneity. Therefore, different transmission modes dominating in each lineage would generate genetic signatures over evolutionary time scale, and population genomic tools can be used to study the genetic associations between host mitochondria and symbionts as well as intra-host and inter-host symbiont populations to understand their transmission mode [10].
The scaly-foot snail Chrysomallon squamiferum is a peltospirid vent snail distributed in the Indian Ocean and houses a sulphur-oxidising gammaproteobacteria as the endosymbiont [15]. Vent molluscs normally house symbionts in the gill that is in direct contact with vent fluid, but the scaly-foot snail hosts the endosymbiont in a hypertrophied oesophageal gland deep inside its body and has a much enlarged circulatory system which delivers sulphide and carbon dioxide to the endosymbiont [16]. Previous analyses of its hologenome showed that the symbiont can utilise sulphuric substances from the vent fluid and synthesise nutrients for the host [15, 17]. The endosymbiont genome also possesses a hydrogenase gene cluster for hydrogen oxidation [15], but whether the endosymbiont of scaly-foot snails can utilise hydrogen remains unclear, similar to the symbiont of Riftia tubeworms which were unable to utilise hydrogen under experimental conditions, even though they possess hydrogenase genes [18].
A previous study of scaly-foot snails reported high genetic homogeneity in the endosymbiont population but divergent mitochondrial genes amongst host individuals from the Kairei vent field on the Central Indian Ridge (CIR), suggesting that this species adopts horizontal transmission [15]. Previous population genetic studies on scaly-foot snail populations from Kairei and Solitaire vent fields on the CIR as well as Tiancheng and Longqi vent fields on the Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR) revealed that these populations are well connected, with the exception of Longqi, and the snails exhibit considerable genetic diversity within each vent field [19, 20]. Whether the endosymbiont genetic homogeneity across the host individuals in Kairei [15] also persists in populations from other vent fields where the endosymbiont has not been studied at the population level remains unclear. This topic is of interest because the transmission mode, symbiont genetic diversity, and adaptation of endosymbionts are poorly studied, especially in Indian Ocean vents.
In the present study, we use population genomics to compare the endosymbionts of scaly-foot snails from five vent sites: Kairei and Solitaire fields on CIR, Tiancheng and Longqi fields on the SWIR, and a newly discovered population in Wocan field on the Carlsberg Ridge (CR) in the northern Indian Ocean [21]. Specifically, we explore the transmission mode, partner specificity, and stability of host–symbiont associations in scaly-foot snails across the five vent fields separated by a maximum linear distance of approximately 5000 km (i.e. between Longqi and Wocan). Considering the results of the present study where the genetic divergence between symbiont populations from the Kairei and Solitaire vents are relatively low and therefore useful to test how the symbiosis functions under different environments, we further examine how the scaly-foot snail holobiont copes with different environmental conditions in the two vents. In situ environmental factors and gene expression patterns of in situ fixed individuals from colonies at Kairei and Solitaire fields are measured to determine their variations between vents and fluctuations within a colony.
Scaly-foot snails were collected from Longqi (“Tiamat” chimney; 37.7839°S, 49.6502°E; 2761 m depth; cruise COMRA DY52; April 2019) and Tiancheng (“Tiantang” chimney; 27.8508°S, 63.9227°E; 2705 m; cruise COMRA DY52; April 2019) on the SWIR by the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) Sea Dragon III on-board R/V Dayang Yihao, from Solitaire (19.5568°S, 65.8482°E; 2606 m depth; cruise YK13-02; February 2013) and Kairei (25.32°S, 70.0403°E; 2415 m depth; cruise YK13-03; March 2013; and YK16-E02; February 2016) on the CIR by the manned submersible DSV Shinkai 6500 on-board R/V Yokosuka and from Wocan (60.53°E, 6.36°N; 2919 m; cruise COMRA DY38; March 2017) on the CR by the HOV Jiaolong on-board R/V Xiangyanghong 9 (Fig. 1a). Snails collected from all sites were immediately stored at −80 °C upon recovery on-board until further usage. A few additional snails from Kairei and Solitaire were fixed in situ using RNA Stabilization Reagent. In detail, during sampling in the seafloor, the snails were collected using a suction pump sampler and immersed in a RNA Stabilization Reagent (25 mM sodium citrate, pH 5.2, 10 mM EDTA, 0.7 kg/L ammonium sulphate) that filled the suction chamber [22, 23]. The sampling system included a collapsible polyethylene bag (Rontainer, Sekisui Chemical, Osaka, Japan) with 10 L of RNA Stabilization Reagent positioned above the suction chamber (5 L in volume) to which it was connected via a tube through a ball valve. After the snails were collected into the suction chamber, the valve was opened and a 5 kg lead weight was placed on top of the collapsible plastic bag to force the RNA Stabilization Reagent into the sampling chamber by gravity. As the RNA Stabilization Reagent is much denser than seawater, it eventually substituted the seawater completely and fixed the snails. The snails remained in the RNA Stabilization Reagent until recovery on-board. Upon recovery on-board, the snails were dissected. The tissues were stored in fresh RNAlater until sufficient infiltration and finally frozen at −80 °C. A few individuals from the Solitaire vent were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution upon recovery and transferred to 80% ethanol at −20 °C for subsequent fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) experiments.
a Bathymetric map showing the relevant Indian Ocean hydrothermal vent fields on the Carlsberg Ridge (Wocan marked in green dot), the Central Indian Ridge (Solitaire in dark blue dot and Kairei in red dot), and the Southwest Indian Ridge (Tiancheng in light blue dot and Longqi in orange dot). b Phylogenetic tree based on 1499 single-copy core genes of scaly-foot snail endosymbionts from the five vent fields. The Chromatiaceae bacterium CTD079 served as an outgroup (Sass et al. 2020 [35]). c Phylogenetic tree of host scaly-foot snails based on 11 protein-coding genes of the mitochondrial genome from the five vent fields. Wocan (green): WCS1, WCS2, and WCS3; Solitaire (dark blue): IW1, IW2, IW3, W2, and W7; Kairei (red): B2, B8, E02B1, E02B2, and Bnaka (from Nakagawa et al. 2014 [15]); Tiancheng (light blue): TCS1, TCS2, TCS3, TCS4, and TCS5; Longqi (orange): LQS1, LQS2, LQS3, LQS4, and LQS5. Source data of (a) is provided in a Source Data file.
The endosymbiont-hosting oesophageal gland was dissected from the scaly-foot snails and used for DNA extraction using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocols. DNA quality was assessed through agarose gel electrophoresis and BioDrop μLITE (BioDrop, Cambridge, UK), and the optical density (OD) 260/280 and OD 260/230 were obtained. DNA quantity was assessed with a Qubit 3 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). For each individual, approximately 1 μg of DNA of the oesophageal gland (OD 260/280 of 1.8 and OD 260/230 of 2.0–2.2) was used for short-insert library (350 bp) and sequenced in a NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, CA, USA) to generate sufficient paired-end reads (Table S1) with a length of 150 bp.
Trimmomatic version 0.39 [24] was used to trim the adaptors and low-quality bases from raw sequencing reads with the settings of “ILLUMINACLIP:adaptor.fa:2:30:10:2:keepBothReads LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 MINLEN:36”. Clean reads were used for symbiont genome assembly and binning. SPAdes version 3.14.1 [25] with settings of “--meta, -k 61, 81, 101, 121” and Megahit version 1.2.9 [26] with settings of “--k-list 75, 95, 115, 135” were used to assemble the genomes. MaxBin2 version 2.2.7 [27] with default settings and manual binning methods [28, 29] were used to isolate the endosymbiont genomes according to the sequencing coverage and the GC content of assembled contigs. The completeness and contamination of each symbiont genome were assessed using CheckM version 1.0.13 [30]. The contiguity (contig N50 value) of the assembled genome was determined using assemblathon_stats.pl (https://github.com/ucdavis-633bioinformatics/assemblathon2-analysis/blob/master/assemblathon_stats.pl). The best assemblies were used for subsequent analyses. The gene sequences of each genome assembly were predicted using Prokka version 1.14.6 [31] with default settings. The predicted protein sequences were searched against the Non-Redundant database in NCBI by using BLASTp version 2.10.0+ with an E-value cut-off of 1e-5. The results were further used for Gene Ontology annotation by using OmicsBox version 1.4.11 (BioBam, Valencia, Spain). The predicted protein sequences were annotated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Automatic Annotation Server [32] with bi-directional best hit methods of BLASTp to search the KEGG database. The functional Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) of the predicted protein sequences were identified using eggNOG-mapper version 5 [33].
Roary version 3.13.0 [34] was used to identify the pan genome amongst the predicted genes of the symbiont genome assemblies from different host individuals. The pan genome results were further used to identify the core genes existing in all 23 endosymbiont assemblies, the accessory genes present in at least two assemblies but not all assemblies, and the assembly-specific genes of endosymbionts from different vent fields. The single-copy core genes were used for phylogenetic reconstruction. The closest known relative of the endosymbiont, a Chromatiaceae bacterium, was used as the outgroup [35]. Protein sequences of each single-copy orthologous gene were aligned using MUSCLE version 3.8.31 [36]. The alignment of all single-copy core genes was further concatenated and used for phylogenetic reconstruction using IQ-TREE multicore version 1.6.12 [37] with the model LG + I + G4 + F and 1000 ultrafast bootstraps. The host mitochondrial phylogenetic tree was constructed based on 11 protein-coding genes following the same method of symbiont phylogenetic analysis. The Robinson–Foulds distance [38] between the symbiont and mitochondrial phylogenies was quantified using T-REX [39].
The coding DNA sequences (CDS) of 1681 single-copy core genes were aligned under the guidance of their alignments of protein sequences by using PAL2NAL version 14 with default settings to identify genes under positive selection [40]. Gblocks version 0.91b with settings of ‘-t=c’ [41] was used to trim the poorly aligned codons. On the basis of the phylogenetic tree, the CDS alignments of these single-copy genes were used to detect positive selection pressure using the MEME [42] and FUBAR [43] models implemented in HyPhy version 2.5.32 [44]. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed based on the results of rich factor calculation and hypergeometric test. The rich factor of each pathway was calculated as the ratio of positively selected gene numbers annotated in a given KEGG pathway term to all gene numbers annotated in the given KEGG pathway, which indicates the degree of pathway enrichment. A hypergeometric test was used to determine the statistical significance, and FDR values < 0.05 were considered to indicate that the pathways were enriched with positive selection.
To understand the population structures and transmission mode of the endosymbionts, we treated each host individual as an endosymbiont population to perform across-vent and within-vent population variation analyses. In the across-vent analysis, population variation analyses were identified and compared across individuals from all vent fields by using the symbiont genome published by Nakagawa et al. [15] as a reference genome for calling the genome-wide SNPs of endosymbiont populations in each snail. The whole genome sequencing reads were aligned to the reference genome by using Bowtie2 version 2.3.5 [45] coupled with SAMtools version 1.9 [46]. A pipeline of Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) version 4.1.9.0 [47] was used to recover the SNPs in the symbionts. In detail, the duplicated reads were filtered using GATK MarkDuplicates. SNPs were called using GATK HaplotypeCaller with settings of “ploidy = 6” (Table S2) to detect mixed bacterial populations [2]. GATK VariantFiltration was used to filter the unreliable SNPs with the settings of “QD < 2.0 || MQ < 40.0 || SOR > 4.0 || FS > 60.0 || MQRankSum < –12.5 || ReadPosRankSum < −8.0”. SnpEff version 5.0c [48] was used to annotate the SNPs and assess the effect of genetic variants. The SNPs of core genes were extracted using BCFtools version 1.12 [49]. The SNPs were used to examine the genetic divergence by using the R package SNPRelate version 1.28.0 [50]. The per-gene nucleotide diversity (π) of intra-host and inter-host endosymbiont populations and fixation index (FST) values indicating the differentiation of genetic structure amongst different symbiont populations was analysed. The π and FST were calculated following the methods and codes (https://github.com/deropi/BathyBrooksiSymbionts/tree/master/Population_structure_analyses) implemented by Ansorge et al. [2]. Based on the FST values, the ordination for the PCoA plot was performed with the ‘pcoa’ function from the R package ape version 5.5 [51] to measure the divergence of symbiont populations amongst host individuals within vents, within ridges, and across ridges. Hierarchical distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) [52] was performed with the “capscale” function from the R package vegan version 2.5-7 [53]. This analysis was further supported by PERMANOVA statistics on pairwise Bray–Curtis dissimilarities with 1000 permutations.
Considering that the symbiont populations showed significantly different genetic divergence patterns across the five vents (Fig. 1b and Fig. S1), we further measured the population genetic diversity within each vent using the endosymbiont genome with the largest contig N50 value of individuals in each vent as the reference genome for calling the SNPs. The SNPs of core genes were identified following the same pipeline used for analysis across vents. Principal component analysis (PCA) of intra-host and inter-host nucleotide diversity was performed for each vent using PAST version 4.03 [54], which was supported by PERMANOVA statistics on pairwise Bray–Curtis dissimilarities with 9999 permutations.
Three ovarian and three testicular tissues from three individuals of scaly-foot snails (they are hermaphrodites) were dissected and embedded in Epredia histoplast paraffin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) using a Revos tissue processor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) with the standard program. Then, the tissues were mounted and embedded with a HistoStar embedding station (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Ten tissue sections (5 µm thickness) of each tissue were cut using HM325 rotary microtome (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). For hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, the tissue sections were dewaxed and then stained with HE in accordance with the standard protocol. After staining, the sections were dehydrated and sealed with neutral balsam. The images were captured using an AxioScan slide scanner (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). For FISH experiments, the tissue sections were first dewaxed in accordance with the standard protocol and then washed three times with PBST (1 × PBS, 0.1% Tween 20) for 5 min each. Specific probes based on a unique region of the 16S rRNA gene of the symbiont (5ʹ-GCGCCACTAAACCCGTAAATG-3ʹ) were designed for binding the symbiont specifically. The specificity of the probe was confirmed by searching against the RDP database with Probe Match [55]. Hybridisation with symbiont-Cy3 and EUB338-Cy5 probes [56] was conducted following the protocol described by Halary et al. [57]. In detail, tissue sections were hybridised at 46 °C for 3 h with hybridisation buffer (50 ng/mL of each probe, 0.9 M NaCl, 0.02 M Tris-HCl, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulphate, and 20% formamide) and then washed in the buffer with 0.1 M NaCl, 0.02 M Tris-HCl, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulphate, and 5 mM EDTA at 48 °C for 15 min. After the hybridisation washing, the sections were labelled with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and Alexa Fluor 488 Conjugate Concanavalin-A (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The sections were finally mounted on a Prolong glass antifade mounting medium (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and then imaged under a Nikon AX confocal microscope.
At Solitaire, colony water from the scaly-foot snail aggregations was collected using a Hachi-Ren water sampler [58] mounted on DSV SHINKAI 6500, and then a pistol-like sampler was inserted into the aggregation to collect water between the snails in the assemblage. The collected fluids were processed as quickly as possible after the recovery of DSV SHINKAI 6500 to minimise the influences of light, oxygen, and temperature. Dissolved gas was extracted from the colony water samples as previously described [58]. The concentrations of dissolved H2 and CH4 were determined using gas chromatography with a helium ionisation detector (GC-HID, GL Science, CA, USA). The concentrations of sulphide and iron (Fe2+) were spectrophotometrically determined using the methylene blue method [59, 60] and the ferrozine method [61, 62], respectively. Water samples obtained using Niskin bottles approximately 400 m away from the venting activity were used as reference for ambient seawater. A phosphorescence dissolved oxygen (DO) and temperature sensor (ARO-USB, JFE Advantech Co. Ltd., Kobe, Japan) was used to measure the scaly-foot snail colony by directly placing the instrument over the snails in situ for 5 min.
Similarly measured environmental parameters for Kairei (with additional measurements using in situ sensors on DSV SHINKAI 6500) were published in Miyazaki et al. [23] and used herein, although the data for methane (R/V Yokosuka cruise YK09-13 Leg 2, November 2009) and Fe2+ (R/V Yokosuka cruise YK13-13), measured following the same methods as above, are newly reported here. Endmember fluid characteristics of the Longqi, Kairei, and Solitaire hydrothermal vents were estimated as previously described [58, 63,64,65].
The oesophageal glands of in situ RNAlater fixed scaly-foot snails were dissected and used for RNA extraction. The TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) was used to extract total RNA, the quality of which was assessed through agarose gel electrophoresis. The Ribo-Zero Magnetic Kit (Human/Mouse/Rat) (Epicenter, WI, USA) and the Ribo-Zero Magnetic Kit (Bacteria) (Epicenter, WI, USA) were further used to remove the rRNA of both eukaryote and bacteria to enrich the mRNA of the symbionts. The enriched symbiont mRNA was used to construct the cDNA library for metatranscriptome sequencing using a NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, CA, USA). Details of the resulting sequencing data are provided in Table S3. Salmon version 1.2.1 [66] was used to quantify the gene expression level of each gene. The differentially expressed genes of symbionts of host snails from Kairei and Solitaire were identified using Trimmed Mean of M-values normalisation method and edgeR package implemented in RNA-seq 2 G [67]. Differentially expressed genes were those with a fold change >2 or <0.5 and an FDR < 0.05. For the host gene expression analyses, different tissues of the same host individuals (Kairei: B2, B8, E02B1, and E02B2; Solitaire: IW1, IW2, IW3, W2, and W7) were used. Functional enrichment analysis was conducted following the same pipeline used in the positive selection analysis. PCA supported by PERMANOVA on pairwise Bray–Curtis dissimilarities with 9999 permutations was applied to analyse the normalised gene expression data using PAST version 4.03 [54]. The transcriptome sequencing reads of different tissues, including foot, ctenidium, sclerites, and oesophageal gland, were recruited from our previous studies [68] following the same pipelines used in the gene expression analyses of symbionts.
The oesophageal glands of scaly-foot snails from Kairei and Solitaire were used for protein extraction through the methanol–chloroform method [69]. The proteins extracted were resolved in a lysis buffer (8 M urea, 20 mM Tris-32 HCl, pH 8.0), and the quantity was measured using a Qubit 3 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), followed by the reduction and alkylation of the extracted proteins. Approximately 30 μg of protein from the oesophageal gland of each snail was digested by trypsin (Promega, WI, USA) and further desalted into peptide following the C18 cartridge solid-phase extraction (Sep-Pak, MA, USA). The peptides were subsequently labelled with TMT 10-plex reagents (TMT 10plex Isobaric Label Reagent Set, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fractionation of the TMT-labelled mix peptide was performed on a Rigol L3000 HPLC. An EASY-nLC 12-UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) coupled with an Orbitrap Q Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) was used to perform shotgun proteomics. Proteome Discoverer v2.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) was used to identify and quantify the proteins through searching the TMT spectra against the target-decoy database of the scaly-foot snail holobiont with the settings of 10 ppm mass tolerance for the precursor ion and 0.02 Da mass tolerance for the product ion. Median normalisation and nonparametric rank product test were used to identify the differentially expressed proteins with a fold change > 1.5 or < 0.67 and an FDR < 0.05. The normalised protein abundances of the host and symbionts were used for PCA supported by PERMANOVA using PAST version 4.03 [54].
We assembled one symbiont genome and one host mitochondrial genome from each of the 23 scaly-foot snail individuals, including five from Kairei (including data of one individual from Nakagawa et al. [15] to make five), five from Solitaire, five from Longqi, five from Tiancheng, and three from Wocan (as only a few animals have been collected from this site so far) (Fig. 1 and Table S1). The size of the assembled endosymbiont genomes varied from 2.52 to 2.83 Mb, with 98.4–99.9% completeness (Table S1). Their average nucleotide identity (ANI) varied from 96.7 to 100%, and those from the same vent field had ANIs greater than 99.3% (Fig. S2). The endosymbionts from each vent field showed higher similarity amongst themselves compared with those from the other vent fields (e.g. between Tiancheng and the four other vent fields). The high ANI values indicated that the snail endosymbionts from the five vent fields belonged to a single symbiont species, considering that a minimum 95% ANI value is the threshold for bacterial species [70]. These results also suggested that the host species established its symbiosis with a specific species of symbiont, supported by the fact that different species of vent peltospirid snails have species-specific partners despite their side-by-side occurrence [17]. Phylogenetic analysis of the endosymbionts based on 1499 single-copy core genes (Fig. 1b) revealed a similar pattern, with the snail endosymbionts from the same vent field clustering together. However, the mitochondrial phylogenetic tree of the host snails showed that the host individuals from the four vent fields, except for Longqi, were mixed with no particular pattern, whereas the Longqi individuals formed a distinct clade (Fig. 1c). This result agrees with the findings of previous host population genetics studies [19, 20]. The endosymbiont lineages were clearly geographically segregated according to vent fields (Fig. 1b) but not to the host (Fig. 1c). The incongruent topologies and a topological Robinson–Foulds distance of 33 (i.e. 33 internal branches were present only in one tree and not in the other) between the host and symbiont phylogenies suggest that scaly-foot snails acquire endosymbionts through horizontal transmission from the environment at each generation [15]. Nevertheless, occasional horizontal transmission could break the congruence of the host mitochondrial and symbiont phylogenies of T. magnifica adopting nearly a strict vertical transmission mode [9]. Therefore, the possibility of vertical transmission cannot be excluded entirely.
For the population variant analysis across vents, db-RDA and PCA analyses based on the SNPs (Fig. S1) revealed that the genetic structures of symbiont populations were segregated by vent fields. This result is in line with the fact that the pairwise FST values of the two host individuals from different vents were higher than those of two individuals within the same vent, indicating that the across-vent genetic divergences were much greater than the within-vent divergence (Fig. S2). For the within-vent analysis, the SNP density and genetic diversities of core genes of each endosymbiont population showed that the extreme intra-host and inter-host genetic homogeneity (SNP density: 0.01–0.02 SNPs/kbp; FST value of pairwise inter-host symbiont populations: < 0.01) of endosymbionts was true for Kairei [15] but not for the other vent fields (Fig. 2, Table S4). In the four other vents, only a small part of the SNPs (Wocan: 3 shared SNPs/618 SNPs in total; Solitaire: 1 shared SNP/6,471 SNPs in total; Tiancheng: 42 shared SNPs/1,797 SNPs in total; Longqi: 17 shared SNPs/11,144 SNPs in total) was shared among all host individuals, suggesting that a considerable heterogeneity was exhibited across host individuals living in the same vent field (Fig. 2b). Except for IW1 and IW3 from Solitaire and LQS3 and LQS4 from Longqi, most symbiont populations within each host exhibited high homogeneity (SNP density: 0.004–0.44 SNPs/kbp) (Fig. 2a), suggesting that the symbionts were obtained via a restricted process. For symbiont populations from Longqi, the FST values between LQS3/LQS4 and LQS1/LQS2/LQS5 were very high (FST: 0.69–0.81), indicating high heterogeneity of symbiont populations between hosts (Fig. 2d, Fig. S2). Bathymodiolus mussels from Mid-Atlantic Ridges can continuously acquire diverse symbiont strains throughout the host’s lifetime and show high intra-host genetic diversity and inter-host homogeneity in symbiont populations living in the same vent [2]. However, a different case was observed in scaly-foot snails. That is, most symbiont populations exhibited intra-host homogeneity and symbiont populations from Longqi vent exhibited inter-host heterogeneity. Although the evidence of free-living symbiont populations of scaly-foot snails in the environment is currently unavailable, the symbiont possesses highly similar genomic features, central metabolic pathways, and motility (i.e. flagellar genes and chemotaxis genes) to its closest known free-living relative, the Chromatiaceae bacterium CTD079 [35]. The symbionts of scaly-foot snails from the five vents possessed assembly sizes ranging from 2.52 to 2.83 Mb (Table S1), including a genome size of 2.60 Mb as reported by Nakagawa et al. 2014, close to that of the Chromatiaceae bacterium CTD079 (genome size: 2.75 Mb). These similar features between the symbiont and its free-living relatives suggest that the symbiont likely possesses a free-living stage. Therefore, scaly-foot snails likely acquire symbiont strains from the ambient environment in a restricted period of the life cycle or vertically inherited symbionts from parental gametes.
a SNP density of core genes of each symbiont population. b Venn diagrams of SNP shared among symbiont populations of all host individuals in each vent. c PCA of intra-host (filled dots) nucleotide diversity (π values) and pairwise inter-host (empty dots) nucleotide diversity based on core genes of symbiont genomes. Individuals from Longqi are separated in another PCA plot because their nucleotide diversities are much higher than those in the other vents. PCA was supported by PERMANOVA on pairwise Bray–Curtis dissimilarities with 9999 permutations. PERMANOVA between intra-host and pairwise inter-host nucleotide diversity within each vent: Wocan: pseudo-F = 0.92 and p value = 0.30; Solitaire: pseudo-F = 1.05 and p value = 0.36; Kairei: pseudo-F = 2.53 and p value = 0.02; Tiancheng: pseudo-F = 1.42 and p value = 0.18; Longqi: pseudo-F = 2.23 and p value = 0.06. d Pairwise (empty dots) and mean (lines) FST values of symbiont populations across all host individuals within each vent. FST values indicate differentiation due to genetic structure, when treating each host individual as a population of endosymbionts. Colour: Wocan (WC: green), Solitaire (So: dark blue), Kairei (Ka: red), Tiancheng (TC: light blue), and Longqi (LQ: orange). Source data are provided in a Source Data file.
The incongruent phylogeny and results of the genetic analyses suggest that scaly-foot snails likely adopted horizontal transmission to obtain its symbionts, but neither can eliminate the possibility of vertical transmission. Therefore, we conducted FISH imaging of the gonads to clarify the possibility of vertical transmission. Results revealed positive signals of the specific probe of the symbionts surrounding the oocytes (Fig. 3, Fig. S3a) but none in the testis (Fig. S3c). These results suggest that scaly-foot snails, similar to vesicomyid clams, are likely capable of transferring the symbionts to their offspring via eggs [6]. In the vesicomyid clam P. okutanii with vertical transmission, the symbionts are found on the surface of egg cells rather than intracellularly like many other vertically transmitted systems, such as Wolbachia in insects [71]. Given the possible vertical transmission, another potential scenario that can lead to the incongruent phylogeny is that several strains could be transmitted on the eggs and then only one strain is selected by the environment during post-settlement growth to dominate in the adult individual. However, as the scaly-foot snail endosymbiont likely possesses a free-living stage, this scenario is less likely than horizontal acquisition. Nevertheless, further studies to confirm the presence of the symbiont in the environment and sequencing of recently settled juvenile snails (not available in the present study) are warranted to rule out this possibility completely.
White arrow: symbiont (in yellow), nuclear DNA with DAPI staining is blue, universal bacterial probe (EUB338) is in red.
Collectively, the scaly-foot snails likely adopted a mixed transmission mode to establish their symbiosis. A mixed transmission mode occurs in many organisms, such as Solemya clams [8], enabling the host to take advantage of both modes [72]. Horizontal transmission could provide the host animals an opportunity to select symbionts that are well adapted and optimised for their specific local environments [13], whereas vertical transmission could provide advantages in mediating maintenance and building a strong fidelity between the symbiotic partners at the species level [73]. Therefore, we hypothesised that a combination of both modes could contribute to the success of scaly-foot snails in many Indian Ocean vents across a wide geographic range.
A comparison of the composition of functional genes amongst all 23 symbiont assemblies revealed variations in the gene content and the statistics of core, accessory, and assembly-specific genes (Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 1). Amongst the 23 symbiont assemblies from the five vent fields, 62.6%–68.8% of the genes were core genes present in all symbiont assemblies; 30.0–36.9% were accessory genes that were present in at least two but not all assemblies; and only 0.002–0.03% were assembly-specific genes (Fig. 4). The core genes included those involved in the Calvin cycle for carbon fixation, TCA cycle, glycolysis, sulphur oxidation, and biosynthesis of essential amino acids and vitamins, which are the key functions for supporting the host snail. When performing positive selection detection across vents, the biosynthesis pathways of amino acids were enriched, indicating the selective force on nutritional commands of the holobionts under the different environmental conditions in the five vents (Fig. S4, Supplementary Data 2, Supplementary Note 1). Very few genes were found to be under positive selection within each vent, suggesting a relaxation of selection in the host individuals living in the same vent field.
The left column figure shows the numbers of core genes, accessory genes, and assembly-specific genes of different assemblies. The right column figure shows the functional Clusters of Orthologous Groups categories of accessory and assembly-specific genes of 23 symbiont assemblies. Colour labelled in the host individuals: Wocan (green): WCS1, WCS2, and WCS3; Solitaire (dark blue): IW1, IW2, IW3, W2, and W7; Kairei (red): B2, B8, E02B1, E02B2, and Bnaka (Nakagawa et al. 2014 [15]); Tiancheng (light blue): TCS1, TCS2, TCS3, TCS4, and TCS5; Longqi (orange): LQS1, LQS2, LQS3, LQS4, and LQS5. [C] Energy production and conversion; [D] Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; [E] Amino acid transport and metabolism; [F] Nucleotide transport and metabolism; [G] Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; [H] Coenzyme transport and metabolism; [I] Lipid transport and metabolism; [J] Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis; [K] Transcription; [L] Replication, recombination, and repair; [M] Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; [N] Cell motility; [O] Post-translational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; [P] Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; [Q] Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; [T] Signal transduction mechanisms; [U] Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; [V] Defence mechanisms; [S] Function unknown; Un: Un-annotated. Source data are provided in a Source Data file.
Examination of the accessory genes amongst the 23 symbiont assemblies allowed us to further explore the metabolic variation based on functional COG categories amongst the symbionts. The accessory genes were mainly involved in several COG categories (shown as capital letters in square brackets), including energy production and conversion [C]; replication, recombination, and repair [L]; cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis [M]; cell motility [N]; signal transduction mechanisms [T]; and intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport [U] (Fig. 4). Within the same vent field, similar patterns of gene contents were detected amongst endosymbionts of snails with a variation of only a few genes (Fig. 5). The patterns of gene contents were likely driven by local environmental selection because the accessory gene patterns were clearly segregated according to the vents (Fig. 5, Fig. S5, Supplementary Note 2). For example, the hydrogenase maturation protease was present in the Solitaire symbionts but absent in the Kairei symbionts, which is congruent with the fact that hydrogen concentration in Solitaire is much higher than that in Kairei (Table 1). Such variations in gene contents involved in essential energy metabolism may be associated with the availability of certain chemical resources in the local environments, indicating the selection forces on the gene content from the environmental conditions. The most energetically optimal stains likely dominated each vent field.
Genes involved in energy metabolism, cell motility, transporters, and defence system exhibit content variations amongst symbiont populations. (CO: carbon monoxide metabolism, N: nitrogen metabolism, ABC: ABC transporters, TA: toxin-antitoxin). Source data are provided in a Source Data file.
Considering that scaly-foot snails inhabit vent fields with varying environmental conditions [58] and host different endosymbiont strains, we explored how the holobionts respond to different environmental conditions and whether the strains function differently across the sites. To address these questions, we compared the transcriptome data of scaly-foot snails from Kairei and Solitaire, the two fields where snails were fixed in situ, environmental factors of the snail colonies were measured either in situ using sensors or water samples collected in gas-tight tubes that were measured on-board, and symbiont populations were genetically close.
Local environmental factors of the scaly-foot snail colonies, including temperature and the concentrations of DO, hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen, methane, and iron (Fe2+), varied in Kairei and Solitaire (Table 1). Such variation is expected for vent ecosystems [74]. Temperature, DO content, and hydrogen sulphide content exhibited higher variations in Solitaire than in Kairei. In general, higher concentrations of hydrogen and hydrogen sulphide but lower concentrations of methane and iron were found in Solitaire than in Kairei (Table 1). Although hydrogen sulphide was only measured on-board for Solitaire and autooxidation during recovery cannot be excluded, the on-board values for Solitaire were still higher than the in situ measurements in Kairei, indicating that hydrogen sulphide concentration is indeed higher in Solitaire than in Kairei. The compositions of endmember fluids in these two vents exhibit considerable differences [58]. These results showed that the scaly-foot snails from the two vent fields had different local environments and fluctuation levels, as evidenced by their different levels of iron sulphide mineralisation and colouration (Fig. 1b) [75]. The comparative gene expression of host genes significantly differed in the scale-secreting epithelia and the gills of the scaly-foot snails from the two vent fields, but no significant differences were observed in the endosymbiont-hosting oesophageal gland. This result indicates that environmental conditions exerted a significantly larger influence on the host gene expression of the tissues in direct contact with the environments than on that of the internal symbiont-hosting organ (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Data 3). For the endosymbionts, 122 genes were differentially expressed, but the KEGG enrichment analysis showed that no KEGG pathways were significantly enriched with differentially expressed genes (Fig. 6b, Supplementary Data 3). A few genes related to the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, two-component system, and ABC transporters were differentially expressed, which were further supported by the protein abundance of the host and symbionts in the oesophageal gland (Fig. 6c, d, Supplementary Data 4). Notably, two genes related to sulphur metabolism, soxZ and sqr, were differentially expressed in the symbionts from the two vent fields. The symbionts showed a more similar symbiotic function in the scaly-foot snails living in the two vent fields than in the symbionts of Alviniconcha snails, which exhibited dynamic metabolism and gene expression with 1776 differentially expressed genes, including 17 key genes related to sulphur metabolism under different environmental conditions [76]. However, Alviniconcha snails host symbionts in the gill, which is in direct contact with the ambient environment; therefore, the host cannot regulate a stable intracellular environment. By hosting the endosymbiont in an organ deep inside the body, scaly-foot snails can regulate and likely maintain a steady concentration of key chemicals, such as hydrogen sulphide and oxygen [16]. In addition, they require a high specificity of endosymbionts at the species level to constrain its function in this specific intracellular habitat, whereas Alviniconcha retains flexibility in species-level associations [77]. Our results are congruent with a previous physiology experiment where scaly-foot snails can maintain a steady metabolic demand in two different experimental temperatures where Alviniconcha failed to do so [78]. Hence, scaly-foot snails can buffer shifts in the environmental conditions for the endosymbionts, a trait likely supported by their hypertrophied circulation system [16]. Overall, these results suggest that the scaly-foot snail hosts actively buffer the environmental differences and changes by moderating their gene expression to provide a stable intracellular environment in the oesophageal gland to the symbionts. Our findings on this symbiosis are summarised in Fig. 7.
a Principal component analysis (PCA) of the normalised gene expression data for different tissue types of the host snail, including foot, gills, oesophageal gland (OG), and scale-secreting epithelium (SSE), from Kairei and Solitaire. PCA was supported by PERMANOVA on pairwise Bray–Curtis dissimilarities with 9999 permutations. Internal tissue of foot: pseudo-F = 0.70 and p value = 1; gill: pseudo-F = 1.59 and p value = 0.10; OG: pseudo-F = 0.65 and p value = 0.70; SSE: pseudo-F = 1.69 and p value = 0.04. b PCA of the normalised gene expression data of endosymbionts from Kairei and Solitaire. PERMANOVA pseudo-F = 3.31 and p value = 0.01. c PCA of the normalised protein abundance of host in the oesophageal gland from Kairei and Solitaire. PERMANOVA pseudo-F = 2.44 and p value = 0.02. d PCA of the normalised protein abundance of endosymbionts from Kairei and Solitaire fields. PERMANOVA pseudo-F = 10.58 and p value = 0.01. Source data of (a), (b), (c), and (d) are provided in a Source Data file.
Symbionts without or with different numbers of dots represent symbionts with different genetic variants. OG: oesophageal gland.
Scaly-foot snails likely adopt a combination of horizontal and vertical transmission modes to establish their symbiosis. Under this mixed transmission mode, scaly-foot snails can not only associate with the free-living symbionts that are well-adapted and optimised for their specific local environment, but also maintain a strong fidelity of symbiotic partners at the species level through heredity and ensure that their offspring can always acquire a suitable endosymbiont. Scaly-foot snails have evolved as an ‘armoured carrying vessel’ for the symbiont, with numerous adaptive novelties that ultimately contribute to their success in hosting endosymbionts and providing them with a stable environment inside its own body [16, 75, 78]. The symbiont benefits from having a protected, stable intracellular environment to grow and multiply, where they steadily provide core functions retained in all local strains for the host snails. The environmental conditions in each vent field select for energetically suitable strains, which all retain the core functions for endosymbiosis. The capacity of the snails to utilise vent-specific strains allows them to inhabit different vent fields. These features collectively underpin the success of the scaly-foot snail holobionts in different vent fields across the Indian Ocean, each with its own extreme environmental parameters.
All genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data were deposited in NCBI under BioProject PRJNA764822 and figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19882906.v1.
All computer commands are based on the available software and scripts listed in the Materials and Methods section and provided in Supplementary Data 5.
Dubilier N, Bergin C, Lott C. Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: the art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:725–40.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Ansorge R, Romano S, Sayavedra L, Porras MÁG, Kupczok A, Tegetmeyer HE, et al. Functional diversity enables multiple symbiont strains to coexist in deep-sea mussels. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:2487–97.
PubMed Article CAS Google Scholar
Breusing C, Genetti M, Russell SL, Corbett-Detig RB, Beinart RA. Horizontal transmission enables flexible associations with locally adapted symbiont strains in deep-sea hydrothermal vent symbioses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:e2115608119.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Nussbaumer AD, Fisher CR, Bright M. Horizontal endosymbiont transmission in hydrothermal vent tubeworms. Nature 2006;441:345–8.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Igawa-Ueda K, Ikuta T, Tame A, Yamaguchi K, Shigenobu S, Hongo Y, et al. Symbiont transmission onto the cell surface of early oocytes in the deep-sea clam Phreagena okutanii. Zool Sci. 2021;38:140–7.
Ikuta T, Igawa K, Tame A, Kuroiwa T, Kuroiwa H, Aoki Y, et al. Surfing the vegetal pole in a small population: extracellular vertical transmission of an ‘intracellular’ deep-sea clam symbiont. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3:160130.
PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Hurtado LA, Mateos M, Lutz RA, Vrijenhoek RC. Coupling of bacterial endosymbiont and host mitochondrial genomes in the hydrothermal vent clam Calyptogena magnifica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:2058–64.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Russell SL, Corbett-Detig RB, Cavanaugh CM. Mixed transmission modes and dynamic genome evolution in an obligate animal–bacterial symbiosis. ISME J. 2017;11:1359–71.
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Russell SL, Pepper-Tunick E, Svedberg J, Byrne A, Ruelas Castillo J, Vollmers C, et al. Horizontal transmission and recombination maintain forever young bacterial symbiont genomes. PLOS Genet. 2020;16:e1008935.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Vrijenhoek RC. Genetics and evolution of deep-sea chemosynthetic bacteria and their invertebrate hosts. In: Kiel S, editors. The vent and seep biota. Topics in Geobiology. 33. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 15–49. volpp
Ozawa G, Shimamura S, Takaki Y, Takishita K, Ikuta T, Barry JP, et al. Ancient occasional host switching of maternally transmitted bacterial symbionts of chemosynthetic vesicomyid clams. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9:2226–36.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Romero Picazo D, Dagan T, Ansorge R, Petersen JM, Dubilier N, Kupczok A. Horizontally transmitted symbiont populations in deep-sea mussels are genetically isolated. ISME J. 2019;13:2954–68.
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Polzin J, Arevalo P, Nussbaumer T, Polz MF, Bright M. Polyclonal symbiont populations in hydrothermal vent tubeworms and the environment. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2019;286:20181281.
Brzechffa C, Goffredi SK. Contrasting influences on bacterial symbiont specificity by co-occurring deep-sea mussels and tubeworms. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2021;13:104–11.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Nakagawa S, Shimamura S, Takaki Y, Suzuki Y, Murakami S, Watanabe T, et al. Allying with armored snails: the complete genome of gammaproteobacterial endosymbiont. ISME J. 2014;8:40–51.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Chen C, Copley JT, Linse K, Rogers AD, Sigwart JD. The heart of a dragon: 3D anatomical reconstruction of the ‘scaly-foot gastropod’ (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Neomphalina) reveals its extraordinary circulatory system. Front Zool. 2015;12:13.
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Lan Y, Sun J, Chen C, Sun Y, Zhou Y, Yang Y, et al. Hologenome analysis reveals dual symbiosis in the deep-sea hydrothermal vent snail Gigantopelta aegis. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1165.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Mitchell JH, Leonard JM, Delaney J, Girguis PR, Scott KM, Drake HL. Hydrogen does not appear to be a major electron donor for symbiosis with the deep-sea hydrothermal vent tubeworm Riftia pachyptila. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;86:e01522–01519.
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Chen C, Copley JT, Linse K, Rogers AD. Low connectivity between ‘scaly-foot gastropod’ (Mollusca: Peltospiridae) populations at hydrothermal vents on the Southwest Indian Ridge and the Central Indian Ridge. Org Divers Evol. 2015;15:663–70.
Sun J, Zhou Y, Chen C, Kwan YH, Sun Y, Wang X, et al. Nearest vent, dearest friend: biodiversity of Tiancheng vent field reveals cross-ridge similarities in the Indian Ocean. R Soc Open Sci. 2020;7:200110.
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Wang Y, Han X, Petersen S, Frische M, Qiu Z, Li H, et al. Mineralogy and trace element geochemistry of sulfide minerals from the Wocan Hydrothermal Field on the slow-spreading Carlsberg Ridge, Indian Ocean. Ore Geol Rev. 2017;84:1–19.
Watsuji TO, Yamamoto A, Takaki Y, Ueda K, Kawagucci S, Takai K. Diversity and methane oxidation of active epibiotic methanotrophs on live Shinkaia crosnieri. ISME J. 2014;8:1020–31.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Miyazaki J, Ikuta T, Watsuji TO, Abe M, Yamamoto M, Nakagawa S, et al. Dual energy metabolism of the Campylobacterota endosymbiont in the chemosynthetic snail Alviniconcha marisindica. ISME J. 2020;14:1273–89.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114–20.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27:824–34.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Li D, Liu C-M, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 2015;31:1674–6.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 2015;32:605–7.
PubMed Article CAS Google Scholar
Albertsen M, Hugenholtz P, Skarshewski A, Nielsen KL, Tyson GW, Nielsen PH. Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:533–8.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Tian R-M, Sun J, Cai L, Zhang W, Zhou G-W, Qiu J-W, et al. The deep-sea glass sponge Lophophysema eversa harbours potential symbionts responsible for the nutrient conversions of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:2481–94.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2068–9.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W182–W185.
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernández-Plaza A, Forslund SK, Cook H, et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;47:D309–D314.
PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015;31:3691–3.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Sass K, Güllert S, Streit WR, Perner M. A hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium enriched from the open ocean resembling a symbiont. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2020;12:396–405.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;32:268–74.
PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Robinson DF, Foulds LR. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math Biosci. 1981;53:131–47.
Boc A, Diallo AB, Makarenkov V. T-REX: a web server for inferring, validating and visualizing phylogenetic trees and networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W573–W579.
PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Suyama M, Torrents D, Bork P. PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W609–W612.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:540–52.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Murrell B, Wertheim JO, Moola S, Weighill T, Scheffler K, Kosakovsky Pond SL. Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. PLOS Genet. 2012;8:e1002764.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Murrell B, Moola S, Mabona A, Weighill T, Sheward D, Kosakovsky Pond SL, et al. FUBAR: a fast, unconstrained bayesian approximation for inferring selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:1196–205.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Kosakovsky Pond SL, Poon AFY, Velazquez R, Weaver S, Hepler NL, Murrell B, et al. HyPhy 2.5—a customizable platform for evolutionary hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2019;37:295–9.
PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078–9.
PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly 2012;6:80–92.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Li H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2987–93.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Zheng X, Levine D, Shen J, Gogarten SM, Laurie C, Weir BS. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:3326–8.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 2004;20:289–90.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Legendre P, Anderson MJ. Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr. 1999;69:1–24.
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara R, et al. Package ‘vegan’. Community Ecol package, version. 2013;2:1–295.
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001;4:9.
Maidak BL, Cole JR, Lilburn TG, Parker CT Jr, Saxman PR, Stredwick JM, et al. The RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) continues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:173–4.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Amann RI, Binder BJ, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW, Devereux R, Stahl DA. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:1919–25.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Halary S, Riou V, Gaill F, Boudier T, Duperron S. 3D FISH for the quantification of methane- and sulphur-oxidizing endosymbionts in bacteriocytes of the hydrothermal vent mussel Bathymodiolus azoricus. ISME J. 2008;2:284–92.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Kawagucci S, Miyazaki J, Noguchi T, Okamura K, Shibuya T, Watsuji T, et al. Fluid chemistry in the Solitaire and Dodo hydrothermal fields of the Central Indian Ridge. Geofluids. 2016;16:988–1005.
Fogo J. Chemistry MPA. Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide. Anal Chem. 1949;21:732–4.
Cline JD. Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural waters 1. Limnol Oceanogr. 1969;14:454–8.
Stookey LL. Ferrozine-a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron. Anal Chem. 1970;42:779–81.
Waterbury RD, Yao W, Byrne RH. Long pathlength absorbance spectroscopy: trace analysis of Fe (II) using a 4.5 m liquid core waveguide. Anal Chim Acta. 1997;357:99–102.
Ji F, Zhou H, Yang Q, Gao H, Wang H, Lilley MD. Geochemistry of hydrothermal vent fluids and its implications for subsurface processes at the active Longqi hydrothermal field. Southwest Indian Ridge Deep-Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2017;122:41–47.
Gallant RM, Von Damm KL. Geochemical controls on hydrothermal fluids from the Kairei and Edmond vent fields, 23°–25°S, Central Indian Ridge. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2006;7:Q06018.
Gamo T, Chiba H, Yamanaka T, Okudaira T, Hashimoto J, Tsuchida S, et al. Chemical characteristics of newly discovered black smoker fluids and associated hydrothermal plumes at the Rodriguez Triple Junction, Central Indian Ridge. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2001;193:371–9.
Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14:417–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Evans P, Chinwalla A, Taylor D RNA-seq 2G: online analysis of differential gene expression with comprehesive options of statistical methods. bioRxiv. 2017:122747.
Sun J, Chen C, Miyamoto N, Li R, Sigwart JD, Xu T, et al. The scaly-foot snail genome and implications for the origins of biomineralised armour. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1657.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Wessel D, Flügge UI. A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal Biochem. 1984;138:141–3.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114.
PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Serbus LR, Casper-Lindley C, Landmann F, Sullivan W. The genetics and cell biology of Wolbachia-host interactions. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:683–707.
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Ebert D. The epidemiology and evolution of symbionts with mixed-mode transmission. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2013;44:623–43.
Funkhouser LJ, Bordenstein SR. Mom knows best: the universality of maternal microbial transmission. PLOS Biol. 2013;11:e1001631.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Cuvelier D, Legendre P, Laës-Huon A, Sarradin PM, Sarrazin J. Biological and environmental rhythms in (dark) deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems. Biogeosciences 2017;14:2955–77.
Okada S, Chen C, Watsuji, Nishizawa M, Suzuki Y, Sano Y, et al. The making of natural iron sulfide nanoparticles in a hot vent snail. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:20376–81.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Breusing C, Mitchell J, Delaney J, Sylva SP, Seewald JS, Girguis PR, et al. Physiological dynamics of chemosynthetic symbionts in hydrothermal vent snails. ISME J. 2020;14:2568–79.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Beinart RA, Sanders JG, Faure B, Sylva SP, Lee RW, Becker EL, et al. Evidence for the role of endosymbionts in regional-scale habitat partitioning by hydrothermal vent symbioses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E3241–E3250.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Sigwart JD, Chen C. Comparative oxygen consumption of gastropod holobionts from deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the Indian Ocean. Biol Bull. 2018;235:102–12.
We thank the great support from the captain and crew of the R/V Xiangyanghong 9 and pilots of HOV Jiaolong during the cruise COMRA DY38 Leg 1 (principal scientist: Xiqiu Han); the captain and crew of the R/V Dayang Yihao and the operation team of the ROV Sea Dragon III during the cruise COMRA DY52 Leg 3; the captain and crew of R/V YOKOSUKA during cruises YK09-13 Leg 2 (principal scientists: Kentaro Nakamura and Satoshi Nakagawa), YK13-02 (principal scientist: Manabu Nishizawa), YK13-03 (principal scientist: Kentaro Nakamura) and YK16-02E (principal scientist: Ken Takai); and the pilots of the DSV SHINKAI 6500 during these cruises. We thank Norio Miyamoto and Hiromi Kayama Watanabe from X-STAR of Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) for collecting scaly-foot snails from the Solitaire vent and fixing them in PFA for FISH experiments. We thank Chenggang Liu from the Second Institute of Oceanography in the Ministry of Natural Resources for taking photos of scaly-foot snails collected from the Tiancheng vent. We thank Ting Xu from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology for her suggestions on the colour code of the figures. We also thank the editors’ and reviewers’ constructive comments that helped us improve an earlier version of the present paper. This work was supported by grants from the Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of the Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (GML2019ZD0409), the Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research of Guangdong Province (2019B030302004), the Hong Kong Branch of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (SMSEGL20SC01), the General Research Fund of Hong Kong SAR (16101219, 12101021), and the China Ocean Mineral Resources Research and Development Association (DY135-E2-1-03). JS was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42176110). CC was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (‘KAKENHI’, grant code 18K06401). The authors wish to acknowledge the Mauritian Government for allowing the sampling of deep-sea animals in the Mauritian EEZ (Ref. 29/2014; 50/38/24 V2).
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
Yi Lan, Hao Wang, Yao Xiao, Yi Yang, Yick Hang Kwan & Pei-Yuan Qian
Department of Ocean Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Yi Lan, Hao Wang, Yao Xiao, Yi Yang, Yick Hang Kwan & Pei-Yuan Qian
Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China
X-STAR, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka, 237-0061, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
Chong Chen, Junichi Miyazaki & Ken Takai
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Department of Biology and Hong Kong Branch of the Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
Yanan Sun & Jian-Wen Qiu
Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics & Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China
Key Laboratory of Submarine Geosciences & Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China
Department of Food and Nutrition, Higashi-Chikushi Junior College, 5-1-1 Shimoitozu, Kitakyusyu, 803-0846, Japan
Department for Continental Shelf, Maritime Zones Administration & Exploration, Prime Minister’s Office, 2nd Floor, Belmont House, 12 Intendance Street, Port Louis, 11328, Mauritius
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
P-YQ conceived the project. YL, JS, and CC designed the experiments. JS, YS, YZ, DB, JM, TW, KT, and XH collected the scaly-foot snails. CC, JS, and YL dissected the scaly-foot snails. JM, TW, and KT measured in situ environmental factors of the scaly-foot snails. YHK and YL performed metaproteomic analysis. YL, YX, and YY performed SNP analysis. MP performed db-RDA analysis of the symbiont populations. HW, CC, and YL performed FISH experiments. YL performed DNA and RNA extraction, symbiont genome assembly and binning, core and pan-genome analysis, gene expression analysis, genetic structure analysis, and positive selection analysis. YL drafted the initial manuscript which was then edited and contributed to by CC, JS, P-YQ, and JWQ. All authors contributed to the final manuscript and agreed with its submission and publication.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Lan, Y., Sun, J., Chen, C. et al. Endosymbiont population genomics sheds light on transmission mode, partner specificity, and stability of the scaly-foot snail holobiont. ISME J (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-022-01261-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-022-01261-4
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
The ISME Journal (ISME J) ISSN 1751-7370 (online) ISSN 1751-7362 (print)